In recent years, the FRC has been the subject of scrutiny relating to its ability to effectively regulate the audit sector. In 2018, the UK government launched an independent review of the agency, headed by Sir John Kingman, then Chair of UK Research and Innovation. The review found that the FRC has several serious constraints on its ability to set effective standards for governance and audit, including a lack of statutory base, government direction that it delegates to industry bodies wherever possible, and little practical regulatory power over the industry. 1
As a result of these deficiencies, Kingman recommended the creation of a formal regulatory body to succeed the FRC, called the Audit, Reporting, and Governance Authority (ARGA). “The regulator should have an overarching duty to promote the interests of consumers of financial information, not producers,” the report says. “It should also have a duty to promote competition; a duty to promote innovation; and a duty to apply proportionality to all its work.”
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion
Sign in and be the first to comment.