Global regulators have spent over a decade striving to establish a framework that would enable the failure of major banks without requiring government support. In light of recent bank failures, it is clear this goal has not been met, and some have begun to question whether it is even possible.
"It is shocking to me that after 15 years of costly reform efforts, we still couldn't resolve even a $200 billion bank like SVB without extraordinary government support," said Jonathan McKernan, a Republican member of the US Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Dodd-Frank Act, which the US passed in 2010, required large banks to create viable "living wills" for orderly bankruptcy without taxpayer money. However, the real-world utility of these plans in a crisis is in question.
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion