Follow TopicFollow Contributor Share Feedback
Testing Compliance: it’s no good if it doesn’t work

Testing Compliance: it’s no good if it doesn’t work

by Starling Insights

Starling Insights Editorial Board

Oct 22, 2021

Observations

Firms and their overseers must enquire into the performance efficacy of risk and compliance systems: does it work?

In a recent article, University of Virginia law professor Greg Mitchell and Duke law professor Brandon Garrett argue that neither companies, but particularly not government regulators or enforcers, should treat compliance as “hope-based” when they investigate to see if a firm is acting in keeping with industry best practices.

This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.

If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item. 

 

If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform.  Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.

Join The Discussion

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!