by Andrea Enria
Former Chair of the Supervisory Board of the European Central Bank (ECB)
Oct 12, 2025
Thoughts
This speech, originally published by the Forum on Financial Supervision, was presented at a closed-door meeting on supervisory effectiveness organized by the Financial Stability Institute and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in Basel on September 24, 2025.1
I am very glad that the issue of supervisory effectiveness is taking centre stage in discussions within the international supervisory community. I would like to praise the team at the IMF for having raised the issue already back in 20102 and then again immediately after the spring 2023 turmoil,3 building on the experience of the Financial Sector Assessment Programs (FSAP). I consider it particularly important that the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) recently decided to work on this topic, publishing a very informative review of economic literature and conducting an important stocktake of good practices. The recent FSI paper on qualitative measures4 is also providing an essential reference in this debate. I was always struck by the dissonance between the heavy criticism aimed at supervisors after banking crises and the almost exclusive focus of the successive policy debates on regulatory repair, with little or no attention paid to supervisory processes and practices.
This content is available to both premium Members and those who register for a free Observer account.
If you are a Member or an Observer of Starling Insights, please sign in below to access this article.
Members enjoy full access to all articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium as well as Starling's special reports. Observers can access a limited number of articles and may purchase articles on an ala carte basis.
You can click the 'Join' button below to become a Member or to register for free as an Observer.
Join The Discussion
Sign in and be the first to comment.