Follow TopicFollow Contributor Share Feedback

Last month, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a statement, promising to attend more closely to the interests of victims when negotiating criminal settlements with corporations. That same day, a federal judge ruled that prosecutors had impinged on the rights of those killed in two Boeing 737 Max crashes.  The prosecutors had negotiated a Deferred Prosecution Agreement without first securing the consent of the bereaved families.

Boeing has admitted that two employees were responsible for misleading the Federal Aviation Administration about the workings of the plane’s automated flight-control system, which was to blame for pushing the aircraft into fatal nosedives. The victims’ families, however, argue that the problems extended far beyond a few rogue employees.

This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.

If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item. 

 

If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform.  Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.

Join The Discussion

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!