In a recent column, Gillian Tett, Chair of the Editorial Board and US Editor-at-Large of the Financial Times, argues that the ongoing banking crisis bears a striking resemblance to the two other financial crises she has watched unfold in her career: Tokyo in the late 1990s and London in 2008. However, she notes one major difference between the recent crisis and those of the past: the access and availability of information.
Fractional banking, the foundation of modern finance, posits that banks must retain only a small proportion of the deposits they collect from customers as depositors rarely seek to withdraw all their money at once. This concept works well in normal conditions, recycling funds into growth-boosting loans and bonds. However, should anything cause depositors to lose trust in their bank's ability to return their money, fractional banking implodes. This has happened throughout history.
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion