Follow Topic Follow Contributor Share Feedback
Closing the Gap in AI-Powered SupTech

Closing the Gap in AI-Powered SupTech

by Starling Insights

Starling Insights Editorial Board

Jul 15, 2026

Observations

In a research brief published this month, CGAP, an independent think tank housed at the World Bank, examines how financial sector authorities in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) can adopt AI-powered SupTech to advance financial inclusion.

The brief, authored by CGAP Senior Financial Sector Specialists Denise Dias and Juan Carlos Izaguirre, frames the analysis around a significant adoption gap. According to the Cambridge SupTech Lab’s State of SupTech Report 2025, 85 percent of financial sector authorities in advanced economies reported using SupTech, compared with 53 percent in EMDEs. Thirty percent of surveyed EMDE authorities are now piloting or deploying AI-powered tools on a limited basis, up from 17 percent in 2024, and the use of generative AI more than doubled between 2023 and 2025.

The brief identifies three mutually reinforcing advantages for authorities that adopt these tools: operational efficiency, broader analytical reach, and augmented decision-making. These tools can advance financial inclusion both directly, through richer monitoring of inclusion and financial health, and indirectly, by lowering compliance costs for providers and building consumer trust. Adoption also carries risks of its own, the authors note, including governance and accountability gaps, automation bias, cybersecurity exposure, and vendor lock-in and concentration.

Dias and Izaguirre argue that effective adoption “is not merely an IT issue” but demands fundamental cultural shifts within supervisory authorities, including breaking down departmental silos, fostering openness to responsible experimentation, and developing workforce strategies that pair supervisory expertise with AI proficiency. Many authorities' cultures remain unconducive to innovation, they observe, marked by data silos, resistance to change, and limited top management support.

CGAP closes with five recommendations: strengthen legal foundations for data protection and ethical AI use, pursue an ambitious but realistic digital transformation agenda, enhance AI risk management, transform organizational culture, and leverage domestic and international collaboration. Absent adoption, the authors warn, the capability gap between supervisors and the AI-driven firms they oversee may erode supervisory effectiveness.

“[T]he objective should not be merely to use AI-powered SupTech, but to leverage it to foster a more inclusive and responsible financial system that meets the needs of all consumers and promotes financial health,” they conclude.

Join The Discussion

Sign in and be the first to comment.

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!