In a recent opinion piece in the Financial Times, Simon Samuels, a Founding Partner of financial services advisory firm Veritum Partners, argues that capital levels are a poor predictor of bank resiliency and stability, encouraging regulators to assess culture to prevent future bank failures.
Following the bank failures of 2023, there has been extensive debate about how much capital banks should be required to hold. While the industry has argued that increasing capital requirements will hinder lending, others contend that capital will, in fact, allow banks to lend more. "This debate misses the point of bank regulation," Samuels asserts. "It is not to stuff banks with so much capital that they cannot fail. Instead, it is to create a banking system that has the appropriate level of risk."
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion
Sign in and be the first to comment.