Follow Topic Follow Contributor Share Feedback

In an op-ed published in Bloomberg this week, Bill Dudley, past-President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, explores how supervisors — often blamed when banks collapse — can be more proactive in preventing bank failures.

“Experts rightly say that the culture of supervision needs to change,” Dudley writes. “I’d go further: The priorities and goals need work, too.” Dudley contends that supervisory culture often encourages hesitation rather than intervention. Supervisors, he writes, have a tendency to avoid challenging bank leadership forcefully, defaulting to delay and procedural caution even when vulnerabilities are visible. Citing Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse, Dudley argues that supervisors should have intervened earlier to compel the banks to resolve shortcomings.

He further asserts that supervisors are too focused on process rather than outcomes. “When engrossed in the issuance of findings (for example, ‘matters requiring immediate attention’ in the US) in areas such as data management, model validation or third-party vendor management, they can miss the forest for the trees,” Dudley writes. In his view, this can obscure important questions while issues that are immaterial to safety and soundness consume supervisory attention.

Dudley goes on to criticize the complexity of existing regulatory frameworks. He argues that capital rules, stress tests, and resolution planning have become overly intricate and insufficiently aligned with their objectives, generating high compliance costs while offering limited practical value in a crisis. Improved communication and engagement, Dudley adds, is also essential. Supervisors and banks may share the goal of safety and soundness, but approach risk from different perspectives. Finally, he argues that incentives for remediation are weak, proposing greater transparency around supervisory constraints to pressure banks to address problems more quickly.

“Supervisors can’t micro-manage banks,” Dudley concludes. “Given clear and simple rules aimed at safety and soundness — and with proper incentives in place — they shouldn’t need to.”

Bill Dudley participated in the stocktake exercise for our recently-released Deeper Dive report, “Supervisors on Supervision.” For more from Bill Dudley and others on supervision, governance, and culture, you can read the full report on Starling Insights.

Join The Discussion

Sign in and be the first to comment.

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!