Follow TopicFollow Contributor Share Feedback

With the Hayne Royal Commission having issued its final report, executives across the Australian financial sector are asking how to correct circumstances that led to past misconduct. Budgets for governance, risk and compliance measures will swell, but those added resources are not likely to produce the desired result without a reappraisal of what drives human behavior within firms. 

Management theory, as it is applied among firms worldwide, persistently elevates the importance of incentives in driving employee behavior. These incentives are seen as primarily financial. Moreover, they also presume the well-known “rational actor” model of human behavior. This results in the belief that, if incentives are properly “aligned,” all will be well and that the optimal way to motivate behavior is one- employee-at-a-time.

This content is available to both premium Members and those who register for a free Observer account.

If you are a Member or an Observer of Starling Insights, please sign in below to access this article.

 

Members enjoy full access to all articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium as well as Starling's special reports.  Observers can access a limited number of articles and may purchase articles on an ala carte basis.

 

You can click the 'Join' button below to become a Member or to register for free as an Observer.

Join The Discussion

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!