In the wake of severe governance failures like those surrounding the emissions scandal at Volkswagen, the US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has pledged to modernize standards that define how auditors should evaluate the risk that public company clients may have broken laws in the course of vetting their earnings and balance sheets.
The audit industry wrote the current standards in the 1980s, before the PCAOB regulated them, and many of those rules remain largely unaltered. In this form, the rules are clear that it’s not up to auditors to determine whether misconduct was committed. Instead, auditors are only required to consider whether the potential cost of misdeeds would materially impact the financial statement, even though those ramifications are often indirect.
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion