In a recent opinion piece for the Australian Financial Review, journalist Joyce Moullakis argues that Australia's Financial Accountability Regime (FAR) has fallen far short of its promise to curb misconduct in banking, insurance, and superannuation.
Designed to make it easier to pinpoint responsibility for governance failures and impose consequences, the regime has yet to deliver a single enforcement action, Moullakis explains. The FAR and its predecessor, the Banking Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR), were meant to prevent executives and boards from hiding behind layers of management and bureaucracy to avoid consequences, she writes. In this direction, the FAR was initially intended to feature individual penalties of up to $1 million, but industry lobbying succeeded in having them stripped out before the regime was legislated in 2023.
This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.
If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item.
If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform. Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.
Join The Discussion
Sign in and be the first to comment.