Follow TopicFollow Contributor Share Feedback

This section comprises the main body of our annual report — the “Compendium” proper. It is broken out by global regions and specific national jurisdictions in each. Where practicable, we have broken the information out further to highlight specific regulatory or supervisory agencies, standard-setting bodies, and other industry organizations of relevance. 

We highlight here the activities and priorities that were in evidence over the last year, both with regard to the supervision of culture and conduct risk concerns and in terms of expectations for the governance thereof within firms. Some markets have experienced more significant public activity, often driven by scandal and public reaction to such. Others have featured less public activity, which may or may not mean that they are actually devoting less attention to issues of culture and conduct, as regulators often engage with firms outside public purview.

This content is available to paid Members of Starling Insights.

If you are a Member of Starling Insights, you can sign in below to access this item. 

 

If you are not a member, please consider joining Starling Insights to support our work and get access to our entire platform.  Enjoy hundreds of articles and related content from past editions of the Compendium, special video and print reports, as well as Starling's observations and comments on current issues in culture & conduct risk management.

Join The Discussion

See something that doesn't look quite right?

We strive to provide high quality and accurate content at all times. With that said, we realize that sometimes links break, new information becomes available, or there is something that you feel we may have missed.

If you see something that you think we should be aware of, we would love to hear from you. Feel free to drop us a note below and leave your name and contact info if you'd like to hear back from us.

Thank you for being a key part of the Starling Insights community!